Razlike u profesionalnoj dobrobiti socijalnih pedagoga koji rade u sustavu socijalne skrbi i školstva

master's thesis

• Title (english): Differences in the professional well-being of social pedagogues in the system of social welfare and education
• Author: Margita Butković
• Mentor: Ivana Maurović (mentor)
• Committee member: Ivana Maurović (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Anja Mirosavljević (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Gabrijela Ratkajec Gašević (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences; Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2025-03-20, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Education/Rehabilitation Sciences

Abstract

Cilj ovog diplomskog rada jest utvrditi postoji li razlika u profesionalnoj dobrobiti među socijalnim pedagozima koji rade u sustavu socijalne skrbi i školstva. Kroz rad se nastoje ispitati razlike u svakom pojedinom segmentu profesionalne dobrobiti – profesionalnom sagorijevanju, zadovoljstvu poslom te radnoj angažiranosti. Također, cilj rada je i ispitivanje povezanosti među navedenim komponentama profesionalne dobrobiti, ako se utvrdi da ona postoji. Podaci koji se kroz diplomski rad obrađuju prikupljeni su putem istraživanja Otpornost stručnjaka različitih profesija nastalog u suradnji stručnjaka Edukacijsko-rehabilitacijskog fakulteta te stručnjaka drugih ustanova i institucija. U spomenutom istraživanju sudjelovalo je 138 socijalnih pedagoga, od čega se, za potrebe ovog diplomskog rada u obzir uzelo njih 80 koji su zaposleni u sustavu socijalne skrbi i školstva. Podaci su prikupljeni online, putem Lime Surveya u razdoblju od 27. svibnja do 27. srpnja 2020. godine (1. vremenska točka istraživanja) te je istraživanje bilo potpuno anonimno i dobrovoljno. Instrumentarij se sastojao od upitnika sociodemografskih obilježja, upitnika zadovoljstva poslom koji je konstruiran upravo za potrebe ovog istraživanja (Maurović i sur., 2020) te Utrecht skale radne angažiranosti (Schaufeli i Bakker, 2003). U radu su korištene metode deskriptivne statistike (aritmetička sredina, standardna devijacija, minimalna i maksimalna vrijednost), Mann-Whitney U test, t-test za nezavisne uzorke te Spearmanov koeficijent korelacije. Rezultati istraživanja ukazuju na visoke razine zadovoljstva poslom i radne angažiranosti, dok je prilikom ispitivanja profesionalnog sagorijevanja utvrđeno kako distribucija ne odstupa značajno od normalne. Prilikom ispitivanja međusobne povezanosti utvrđena je statistički značajna negativna povezanost između zadovoljstva poslom i profesionalnog sagorijevanja među socijalnim pedagozima koji rade u sustavu školstva (r = -,330; p<0,05) te je utvrđena statistički značajna negativna povezanost između radne angažiranosti i profesionalnog sagorijevanja među socijalnim pedagozima u sustavu školstva (r = -,513; p<0,05), ali i među socijalnim pedagozima u
sustavu socijalne skrbi (r = -,527;p<0,05). Statistički značajna pozitivna povezanost između radne angažiranosti i zadovoljstva poslom nije utvrđena niti u jednom sustavu.

Abstract (english)

The aim of this thesis is to determine whether there is a difference in professional well-being among social pedagogues working in the social welfare and education systems. The study seeks to examine differences in each specific segment of professional well-being—professional burnout, job satisfaction, and work engagement. Additionally, the thesis aims to explore the relationships between these components of professional well-being, if such connections are found to exist. The data analyzed in this thesis was collected through the research Resilience of Professionals from Different Professions, conducted in collaboration between experts from the Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences and professionals from other institutions and organizations. A total of 138 social pedagogues participated in the study, of which 80, employed in the social welfare and education systems, were included in this thesis. The data was collected online via LimeSurvey between May 27 and July 27, 2020 (first wave of data collection). The study was completely anonymous and voluntary. The research instruments included a sociodemographic questionnaire, a job satisfaction questionnaire specifically developed for this study (Maurović et al., 2020), and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003). The study employed descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values), the Mann-Whitney U test, an independent samples t-test, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The research results indicate high levels of job satisfaction and work engagement. However, when examining professional burnout, the distribution did not significantly deviate from normal. The analysis of correlations revealed a statistically significant negative relationship between job satisfaction and professional burnout among social pedagogues working in the education system (r = -0.330; p < 0.05). Additionally, a statistically significant negative correlation was found between work engagement and professional burnout among social pedagogues in the education system (r = -0.513; p < 0.05) as well as among those in the social welfare system (r = -0.527; p <
0.05). However, no statistically significant positive correlation was found between work engagement and job satisfaction in either system.

• Keywords: socijalna pedagogija; profesionalna dobrobit; profesionalno sagorijevanje; radna angažiranost; zadovoljstvo poslom; školstvo; socijalna skrb
• Keywords (english): Social Pedagogy; professional well-being; professional burnout; work engagement; job satisfaction; education; social welfare
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:158:877525
• Study programme: Title: University graduate study of Social Pedagogy; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: sveučilišni magistar/magistra socijalne pedagogije (sveučilišni magistar/magistra socijalne pedagogije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2025-03-28 12:44:42